In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Starczewski
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 We are ultimately responsible for disciplining attorneys who bring disrepute to the legal profession. In this case, the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) charged Marja Starczewski with three counts of attorney misconduct because she represented her client without diligence, information, or honesty. At the disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer concluded the WSBA had proved all three counts. He recommended a sanction of $15,000 in restitution, 24 months of suspension, and 18 months of practice monitoring. The WSBA Disciplinary Board (Board) adopted the hearing officer’s decision…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PooleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PfeferWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- In re CottinghamWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Disciplinary Proc. Against KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.