Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Alcott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 28, 1944No. 31610PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Alcott and others paid the taxes herein discussed under protest, and sued for recovery thereof. They were separate owners of “coin-operated music boxes ' or machines” placed upon premises of others under agreements to divide proceeds.

Their contention is that House Bill 59 of the 19th Legislature, Title 68 O.S. Supp. 1943, §§1541 to 1544, inclusive, is unconstitutional in two respects, to wit:

“First, That said bill is ambiguous, indefinite and uncertain in respect to its definition of an ‘operator,’ upon whom the bill attempts to impose the duty and obligation of making monthly reports and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Rakowski v. Wagoner, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. State Ex Rel. Read, Ins. v. Midwest Mutual Burial Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. City of Tulsa v. Metropolitan Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Arthur v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Olson v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Red Rock Petroleum Co. v. City of ChoctawCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Arthur v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API