City of Tulsa v. Metropolitan Jewelry Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; II. A. Breekenridge, Judge. Actions for injunction by the Metropolitan Jewelry Company against the City of Tulsa and others, and by the Benjamin Jeweler Rice Company against the same defendants. Demurrer to petitions overruled, and permanent injunctions granted, and defendants in each action bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SPRINGER, C.
In this opin-' ion the plaintiffs in error will be referred to as defendants, and the defendants in error will be referred to as plaintiffs, that being the status of the parties in the lower court. Both cases presenting the same identical question, eases 8847 and 8848 are consolidated in this opinion.
The plaintiff instituted suit in the lower court against the defendants to restrain by injunction the enforcement of what is alleged to be an illegal, oppressive, confiscatory, and void city ordinance. That part of the petition necessary for a disposition of this case…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Davis & Farnum Manufacturing Co. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- City of Lyons v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Davis v. FasigIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Cain's Coffee Co. v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Red Slipper Club, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Mitchell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Ex Parte DickisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.