Legal Opinion

Arthur v. City of Stillwater

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 1980No. 54164PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

This action was brought by a group of interested taxpayers [before the attorney general in his capacity as ex-officio Bond Commissioner1 has approved or disapproved the general obligation bonds] to challenge the validity of an election authorizing the issuance of the bonds.

On April 16, 1979, the Board of Commissioners of the City of Stillwater, Oklahoma, adopted Ordinances No. 1834 and No. 1835. These ordinances provided for the leasing of the City’s water, sewer, electric and solid waste disposal systems to the Stillwater Utilities Authority [Trust], a public trust created…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McNichols v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Anselmi v. City of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rich v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Harrison v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 360Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. In Re Initiative Petition No. 315, State Question No. 553Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 341, State Question No. 627Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Quinn v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API