Rakowski v. Wagoner, County Judge
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
citing: Massey v. Dunlap, 146 Ind. 358; Robinson v. Varnell, 16 Tex. 382; TValler v. Harris, 20 Wend. (N. Y.) 555; Corning v. Meade Co., 102 Fed. 57; Ravenscrafl v. Corners (Idaho) Ml Pac. 943; Commonwealth v. Brown (Pa.) 11 Phila. 370; McNaughton v. Railroad Co., 19 Fed. 881; Doles v. Hilton, 48 Ark. 308; Helm v. Chapman, 66 Cal. 291; Edwards v. Man-ton, 92 Tex. 152; In re Matthews, 109 Fed. 518; Gilbert v. Morgan, 98 111. App. 281; Gt. L. Ins.
Read the full summary
citing: Massey v. Dunlap, 146 Ind. 358; Robinson v. Varnell, 16 Tex. 382; TValler v. Harris, 20 Wend. (N. Y.) 555; Corning v. Meade Co., 102 Fed. 57; Ravenscrafl v. Corners (Idaho) Ml Pac. 943; Commonwealth v. Brown (Pa.) 11 Phila. 370; McNaughton v. Railroad Co., 19 Fed. 881; Doles v. Hilton, 48 Ark. 308; Helm v. Chapman, 66 Cal. 291; Edwards v. Man-ton, 92 Tex. 152; In re Matthews, 109 Fed. 518; Gilbert v. Morgan, 98 111. App. 281; Gt. L. Ins. Co. v. Tubot, 113 Ind. 273; Small v. Small, 129 Pa. 366; Wassell v.' Tunnah, 25 Ark. 101; Cincinnati, etc., Co. v. 'Avondale, 43 Ohio St. 257;…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The issue in this case involves the validity of an act of the Legislature of 1909, known as “House Bill No. 460,” entitled “An act providing for holding county court at the town of Prague, in Lincoln county.” Said act was passed by virtue of the authority of section 13, art. 7 (Bunn’s Ed. § 185; Snyder’s Ed. p. 221), of the Constitution of Oklahoma, which provides:
“* * * rpjjg ecn.mty court shall be held at the county seat, but the Legislature may provide for holding sessions of the county court at not more than two additional places in the county: Provided, that alternate sessions of county…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Edwards v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Robinson v. VarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Massey v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 23, State Question No. 38Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 2 of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Taylor v. CockrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.