Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrand
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice:
The facts surrounding the employee’s (Mr. LeGrand’s) death are not in dispute. Claim by the widow and children was timely filed and the employer does not contest the amount of the award.
The sole issue presented in the present petition for review is whether or not in death benefit claims cases the employer and/or carrier has a right of subrogation against the negligent third party. In Updike Advertising System v. State Industrial Commission 1 this court held that no such right existed under 85 O.S.1951, § 44. This statutory provision was, however, amended by Section 32,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Midwest City v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- City of Duncan v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.