Legal Opinion

Hegna v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 12, 1992No. Civ. 4-91-678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company’s (“DuPont”) motion for summary judgment on plaintiff Marilyn Hegna’s (“Heg-na”) negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty and misrepresentation claims. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, DuPont’s motion for summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

The present action arises from alleged defects in implants that Hegna received during surgery on her temporomandibular joints (“TMJ”), which are located in the jaw. 1 Hegna’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re BROOKLYN NAVY YARD ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Russo v. NCS Pearson, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  3. Parker v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Conwed Corp. v. UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS AND PLAST. CO.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API