Legal Opinion

Conwed Corp. v. UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS AND PLAST. CO.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 3, 2001No. Civ. Action 5-92-88PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALSOP, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant and Third Party Plaintiffs, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Company, Inc. (f/k/a Union Carbide Corporation) (“Union Carbide”), motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff Conwed Corporation (f/k/a Wood Conversion Company) (“Conwed”) was a sophisticated user of asbestos. For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny Defendant’s motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Between 1959 and 1974, Conwed manufactured asbestos-containing ceiling tiles in its plant in Cloquet, Minnesota. From 1965 through July 1974,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Conagra, Inc., Doing Business as Northwest Fabrics & CraftsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Mulder v. Parke Davis & CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Annie Miners v. Cargill Communications, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dj Coleman, Inc. v. Nufarm Americas, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API