Legal Opinion

Browning v. Howerton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 18, 1998No. 21633-7-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

Larry and Shirley Browning, purchasers of real estate, sought to reform the real estate contract. They contended there was a mutual mistake regarding the acreage, which led to a mistake as to price. Applying the three-year statute of limitations for actions based upon oral contracts or actions grounded in fraud, the trial court dismissed the case as untimely. On appeal, the Brownings argue that the trial court should have applied the six-year limitation period for actions “arising out of a written agreement.” RCW 4.16.040. We affirm, holding that the three-year statute of limitations is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In re the Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Matter of Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kloss v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. Family Medical Building, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lehrer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Lehrer v. Dept. of Social & Health Servs.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Hudson v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Hudson v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Hornback v. WentworthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API