Legal Opinion
Kloss v. Honeywell, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 30, 1995No. 33091-8-IPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Honeywell, Inc., appeals a judgment in favor of Charles W. Kloss, alleging the court erred in finding a written contract, the suit was barred by the 6-year statute of limitations, and Kloss failed to mitigate his damages. We affirm.
Facts
Charles W. Kloss sued his former employer, Honeywell, for breach of contract in which Honeywell promised to place him in the position of industrial nurse upon completion of an educational program to obtain a registered nurse degree. The trial court found Honeywell had breached the contract and awarded Kloss $130,084.50 in damages and $29,467.75 in costs and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Hogland v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.