Legal Opinion

Hornback v. Wentworth

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 2006No. 23842-3-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶1 — This is a real estate contract dispute between purchasers David and Susan Hornback and vendors Ken and Diane Wentworth. The purchasers failed to make contract payments, and then a zoning change made contract performance illegal. The Hornbacks asked for their money back. The Wentworths refused. The Hornbacks sued for rescission. Based upon impossibility, the court equitably discharged the contract obligations by granting common law rescission to the Hornbacks and ordered restitution of payments with statutory 12 percent interest from the date of rescission. On appeal, the Hornbacks…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason ContractorsWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rivers v. STATE CONF. OF MASON CONTRACTORSWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bloor v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Bloor v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Hornback v. WentworthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Jackowski v. BorcheltCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Jackowski v. BorcheltCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API