Legal Opinion

Vu v. California Commerce Club, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 1997No. B093696PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FUKUTO, J.

Plaintiffs Tom Vu and Mansour Matloubi appeal from summary judgment in favor of defendants California Commerce Club, Inc. (the club), and Huong Mai, in an action to recover money plaintiffs lost while playing card games at the club, assertedly as a result of cheating. We affirm.

Facts

The club provides facilities for card games legal in the City of Commerce, including two that plaintiffs played, “Asian stud” poker and “Pan-Nine.” Betting at the club is only among the players; the club provides the facility, cards, chips, and dealers, and receives a fee per hand from each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Youst v. LongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jack K. Berman v. Riverside Casino Corporation, H. J. Munley, Emmet Munley, William Miller, First Doe and Second DoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. US Ecology, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API