US Ecology, Inc. v. State
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
On this appeal we are presented with an issue of first impression: whether a plaintiff pursuing a claim for promissory estoppel must prove that the defendant on that claim caused the plaintiff’s damages. We conclude that, as in ordinary contract actions, a plaintiff seeking recovery on a promissory estoppel theory must prove that the defendant’s breach was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s damages. Further, even if we were to conclude that causation is not a necessary element of all promissory estoppel claims, we hold that because promissory estoppel is an…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- US Ecology, Inc. v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Amanda Sateriale v. R J Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Shoyoye v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Rosal v. First Federal Bank of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.