Legal Opinion

Monster Energy Company v. Schechter

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2019No. S251392PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Corrigan, J.

**100 *785 Here the parties to a tort action agreed to settle their lawsuit. Their agreement was reduced to writing and included several provisions purporting to impose confidentiality obligations on the parties and their counsel. All parties signed the agreement and their lawyers signed under a *299 notation that they approved the written agreement as to form and content.

Counsel allegedly violated the agreement by making public statements about the settlement and were sued, inter alia, for breach of contract. Counsel urged they were not personally bound by the confidentiality provisions and moved to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Gregory Selden v. Airbnb, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  2. Chamber of Commerce of the US v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Chamber of Commerce of the US v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Olson v. DoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Todd Ashker v. Gavin NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API