Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Harlow
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1921No. Civ. No. 2249PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover the aggregate sum of $1,846, alleged to be due him from defendant according to the terms of a certain contract into which, it is alleged, he and the defendant entered on the twenty-fifth day of July, 1918.
The court below sustained a demurrer interposed by defendant to the complaint upon both general and special grounds. The plaintiff refused to amend his complaint, although allowed by the court ten days within which to do so, if so advised, and thereupon judgment by default was entered against plaintiff.
The appeal is from said judgment.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Stone v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Stone v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Percival v. National Drama CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Gaspar v. United Milk Producers of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Erler v. Five Points Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. BumgarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Wood v. GirotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929