Erler v. Five Points Motors, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LAZAR, J. pro tem. *
The subject action arises from breach of an employment contract in which the plaintiff was the employee and the defendants the employer. Plaintiff was engaged to manage an automobile business with compensation at the rate of $1,300 per month. The corporate employer-defendant was found to be the alter ego of the individual defendants. Plaintiff’s employment commenced October 1, 1963, to run for one year; the wrongful discharge occurred February 1, 1964. These facts were determined by the trial court upon conflicting and substantial evidence.
At the trial defendants sought to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Costigan v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail-RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Oldenkott v. American Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Stanchfield v. Hamer Toyota, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.