Consolidated Freight Lines, Inc. v. Department of Public Service
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court affirming an order of the state department of public service.
All of the appellants are now, and at all times in this action mentioned were, common carriers of freight in this state, authorized by the department of public service to haul freight by motor vehicle. The Davenport hotel is the principal hotel in the city of Spokane. In the course of its business, it had a large amount of freight and baggage moving to and from its place of business, both intrastate and interstate. Each of the appellants was serving the hotel in the capacity of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fornili v. Auto Mechanics' Union Local No. 297 of the International Ass'n of MacHinistsWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Burlington, C. R. & N. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1888
- Burgess Bros. v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1920
- Baasch v. Cooks Union, Local No. 33Washington Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
- Burlington Transportation Co. v. HathawaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
- General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.