Legal Opinion

Fornili v. Auto Mechanics' Union Local No. 297 of the International Ass'n of MacHinists

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1939No. 27528. Department OnePublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought seeking injunctive relief. At the time the complaint was filed, a temporary restraining order was issued, and also a show cause order. Upon the return day of the show cause order, a hearing was had, the result of which was the denial of a temporary injunction. Subse quently, the case came on for trial upon the merits, and the court refused a permanent injunction. From the judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiffs appealed.

The respondent Auto Mechanics’ Union Local 297 will be referred to as the union, and C. E. Rowley, who is the business representative of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Retail Clerks' Union, Local No. 148Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Adams v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Shafer v. Registered Pharmacists Union Local 1172California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Park & Tilford Import Corp. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Roth v. Local Union No. 1460 of Retail Clerks UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Gazzam v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262Washington Supreme Court · 1947

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API