Legal Opinion
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 30, 1953No. Civ. A. 1686PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Chief Judge.
This opinion will concern itself with long dead events. The passions and emotional stresses which brought these about have lost their flame. In the interest of the public and the nation, it may be assumed that never again will the employer, the unions and the carriers be enmeshed in such a train of events. These circumstances must be reviewed to determine only whether there is legal responsibility for the situation and, if so, whether damages shall be allowed against the carriers jointly or against any one of them alone. It is the essence of the judicial process…
2Cases cited169 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Annapolis RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Morales Mejías v. Metropolitan Packing & Warehousing Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- V. L. Johnson, D/B/A v. L. Johnson Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Maine Central RailroadDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1977
- Meier & Pohlmann Furniture Co. v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.