Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Burlington Transportation Co. v. Hathaway

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1943No. 46246PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMulroney, C. J.

Each of the plaintiffs is a common carrier of freight, by means of motor vehicles, operating to and from Burlington, Iowa. Their drivers belong to the defendant Local Union No. 218 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, hereinafter called the union. The defendants Gordon Hathaway and Roy Tweedell are business agents of the union.

John Blaul’s Sons Company is a wholesale grocery company located in Burlington, whose truck drivers do not belong to the union. The defendant union, in its effort to unionize the Blaul Company, established a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Carlson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. R. H. White Co. v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Mills v. International Woodworkers of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Northwestern Pacific Railroad v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Fred Wolferman, Inc. v. RootSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
  5. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API