Royce Ainsworth v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARAMORE, Judge.
This case was before us on the question of liability in Ainsworth v. United States, 180 Ct.Cl. 166 (1967), wherein we granted plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We held that, under the reasoning of Born v. Allen, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 217, 291 F.2d 345 (1960) and Born v. United States, 155 Ct.Cl. 821 (1961), the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) had denied plaintiff the procedural rights to which he was entitled.
There had been a reduction in force in the Washington, D. C. area, and plaintiff’s function was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Casman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- John Burich v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gratehouse v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Daniel S. Urbina v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Sherar v. HarlessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.