Gratehouse v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge
Plaintiff seeks back pay and reinstatement to his position by reason of an alleged procedural error on the part of the Civil Service Commission (CSC) in failing to consider and decide plaintiff’s claim that his resignation from departmental employment was coerced. Defendant argues that the claim of duress is simply an afterthought of plaintiff’s, that he did not even raise the issue before the effective date of his resignation, and that, therefore, the agency and the CSC *293did not consider it and violated no adverse action procedures, as alleged by plaintiff. Defendant asks that we dismiss the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Bookman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Vanover v. HantmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Mazaleski v. TreusdellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Margaret A. Cheeseman v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.