Legal Opinion
Sherar v. Harless
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1977No. Nos. 74-2261, 75-1133 and 75-1223PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge:
The principal issue before us is whether the District Court has subject matter jurisdiction of No. 74-2261, appellant’s back pay claim. It was concluded at the time of argument that No. 75-1223 is moot, and we need not discuss the government’s contention that the anti-injunction statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7421, would be violated by the requested injunctive relief. No. 75-1133 is also moot, in that there is no further need to enforce the summonses involved in that case, because the records requested in the summonses have, since argument, been produced by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Royce Ainsworth v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Angel Soto v. Unknown SweetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Bakersfield City School District of Kern County v. Ernest Boyer, Bakersfield City School District v. Ernest BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Westside Property Owners v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Giordano v. RoudebushCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.