State v. Diaz
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 The question in this ease is whether a defendant convicted of possessing methamphetamine for sale who has two non-methamphetamine-related historical prior felony convictions was properly sentenced under Arizona’s general repetitive offender statute rather than a statute applicable to certain methamphetamine-related offenses. We hold that the methamphetamine sentencing statute does not prohibit the trial court from enhancing the sentence of a defendant who has non-methamphetamine-related historical prior convictions under the general repetitive offender statute.
I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Daniel DiazArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Daniel DiazCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.