Legal Opinion

State v. Diaz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2010No. CR-09-0257-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 The question in this ease is whether a defendant convicted of possessing methamphetamine for sale who has two non-methamphetamine-related historical prior felony convictions was properly sentenced under Arizona’s general repetitive offender statute rather than a statute applicable to certain methamphetamine-related offenses. We hold that the methamphetamine sentencing statute does not prohibit the trial court from enhancing the sentence of a defendant who has non-methamphetamine-related historical prior convictions under the general repetitive offender statute.

I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. State of Arizona v. Daniel DiazArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State of Arizona v. Daniel DiazCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API