Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Daniel Diaz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 27, 2012No. 2 CA-CR 2011-0252-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioner Daniel Diaz seeks review of the trial court’s order dismissing his post-conviction relief proceeding, initiated pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P. We will not disturb a trial court’s ruling denying post-conviction relief absent a clear abuse of discretion. State v. Swoopes, 216 Ariz. 390, ¶ 4, 166 P.3d 945, 948 (App.2007). Diaz has not sustained his burden of establishing such abuse here.

¶ 2 Following a jury trial, Diaz was convicted of possession of a dangerous drug for sale and sentenced to an aggravated term of twenty-five years’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CarrigerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. McFordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Daniel DiazArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State of Arizona v. Darren Irving GoldinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. Bodney 130538 v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  4. Hall 353631 v. Arizona, State ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Loya v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API