Legal Opinion

Katenkamp v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1940No. S. F. 16449PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Petitioner and other persons, owners of beach property in Santa Barbara County, recovered a judgment in the Superior Court of that county on July 20, 1937, ordering the Union Realty Company to remove two groins upon its property which were causing the beach of the plaintiff’s property to be washed away and accordingly found to be nuisances. The judgment also enjoined the corporation from erecting on its property any structure which would interfere with the normal flow of the tides. The judgment was affirmed by the District Court of Appeal for the Second District and this court denied a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Walling v. James v. Reuter, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API