Legal Opinion
Leach v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 1992No. 92-10PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Justice.
An arson conviction provides cause for our review of a corpus delicti issue. Ability to pay presents a restitution question and the appeal includes an ineffectiveness of counsel contention. The second issue— restitution — is conceded by the State. The third issue is conceded by appellant and we affirm the conviction on the arson charge.
Farron Dean Leach, appellant, and his ex-girlfriend (OGF) had a tempestuous on-again, off-again romantic relationship having, at one time, lived together. A onetime restraining order had also been obtained by OGF. May 4 and 5, 1991 provided a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Neville v. Appellate DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Alcala v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Herdt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Betzle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Murray v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Barkell v. CrouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.