Legal Opinion

Betzle v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1993No. 91-74PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The primary issue presented by this case is whether inadmissible hearsay testimony was received at the trial of Gary T. Betzle (Betzle) on charges of second degree sexual assault; third degree sexual assault; and indecent liberties. The accused denounced testimony consisted of reports by a professional counselor, trained in psychology, and a pediatrician of what the intellectually-handicapped minor victim had told them about Betzle’s criminal acts. The question is of special importance in this case because, apart from Betzle’s own admissions, this testimony is the essential…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. English v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Yung v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API