Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Mazeaux

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth District, Sacramento County. The case is stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Cbockett, J,, delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an action to recover possession of a lot in the City of Sacramento, and the plaintiff claims to have deraigned his title from John A. Sutter, under a confirmed Mexican grant, and a patent thereon from the Government of the United States. The answer is a general denial of the plaintiff’s title, and an allegation of title in the defendants. On the trial the defendants offered no proof of title, and the case turns upon the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s proofs, to overcome the presumption of title arising from the possession of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Vance v. ForeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Hurlbutt v. ButenopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Chapman v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Martin v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Stanwood v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Snooks v. WingfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API