Legal Opinion

Moylan v. Dykes

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1986No. Civ. 24189PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

In this case we conclude a road easement reserved in a deed may be appurtenant to a parcel of real property the easement does not touch.

Defendants David and Barbara Dykes appeal from a judgment enjoining them from interfering with plaintiffs James Moylan, Eldred Koehn-Hoffman, and Caroline Niemann’s use of an easement across their (defendants’) land. The judgment also awarded each plaintiff $3,975 plus interest as damages for defendants’ obstruction of the easement.

Defendants contend: (1) plaintiffs do not have an easement on their land based on record title; (2) defendants’…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Camp Meeker Water System, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API