Moylan v. Dykes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this case we conclude a road easement reserved in a deed may be appurtenant to a parcel of real property the easement does not touch.
Defendants David and Barbara Dykes appeal from a judgment enjoining them from interfering with plaintiffs James Moylan, Eldred Koehn-Hoffman, and Caroline Niemann’s use of an easement across their (defendants’) land. The judgment also awarded each plaintiff $3,975 plus interest as damages for defendants’ obstruction of the easement.
Defendants contend: (1) plaintiffs do not have an easement on their land based on record title; (2) defendants’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Kazi v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Camp Meeker Water System, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.