Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 26, 2007No. PD-1603-05PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

Orian Lee Scott was convicted of nine offenses relating to his conduct involving three teenage boys. Scott appealed, arguing that the consolidation of the offenses in each Count Three, to which Scott had entered guilty pleas, with the offenses in each Count One and Two was improper and affected his substantial rights. The court of appeals agreed. 1 We find that the court of appeals erred in doing so and reverse its judgments as to Counts Two and Count Three.

Facts and Procedural History

Orian Lee Scott hired three teenage boys to do various tasks around his home, which included yard…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Llamas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Warmowski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Llamas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  5. Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005

4Cited by24 opinions

  1. Werner, Dieter HeinzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Darling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  3. Hodge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Dieter Heinz Werner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  5. Darling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API