Legal Opinion

Llamas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 2000No. 1799-98PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, Justice

Appellant was charged in separate indictments for possession of a motor vehicle with an altered vehicle identification number and possession of cocaine. At a pretrial hearing, the trial court granted the State’s motion to consolidate the two indictments for trial over appellant’s objection. The jury found appellant not guilty of possession of a controlled substance and guilty of possession of a motor vehicle with obliterated identification numbers. After making findings of true as to the allegations in the two enhancement paragraphs, the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Warmowski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Llamas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999

4Cited by137 opinions

  1. Motilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Schutz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API