Legal Opinion

Warmowski v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1993No. 1224-91PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Appellant was separately indicted for possession of methamphetamine and possession of cocaine. The two indictments were consolidated for trial, despite appellant’s objection pursuant to V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 3.04(a). 1 Punishment was assessed by the trial court at ten years probation and a five hundred dollar fine in each cause. A motion in arrest of judgment was filed for each conviction. The trial judge granted the motion only as to the conviction for possession of cocaine.

Appellant’s conviction for the methamphetamine…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Nunfio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Callins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bigby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Llamas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Puente v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API