Warmowski v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was separately indicted for possession of methamphetamine and possession of cocaine. The two indictments were consolidated for trial, despite appellant’s objection pursuant to V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 3.04(a). 1 Punishment was assessed by the trial court at ten years probation and a five hundred dollar fine in each cause. A motion in arrest of judgment was filed for each conviction. The trial judge granted the motion only as to the conviction for possession of cocaine.
Appellant’s conviction for the methamphetamine…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Nunfio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Callins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bigby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Llamas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Puente v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.