Legal Opinion

Darling v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided September 10, 2008No. 06-06-00150-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

In Tommy Walter Darling’s jury trial for the charge of indecency with a child arising in 2004, the complainant’s trial testimony provided no evidence that Darling had been indecent with the complainant. 1 The young girl testified that Darling “touched” her only once and did not detail how or where he touched her, or provide any information to suggest that this single touch was in any way indecent.

Then there was the videotape of the complainant’s forensic interview, during which she said the “touching” occurred a “lot of times.” This videotape is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Llamas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
  2. Leavelle Franklin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  3. Hodge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Allan Cunningham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  5. Armando Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API