Werner, Dieter Heinz
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
In two separate indictments, appellant was charged with stalking his former girlfriend. 1 Before trial, the judge permitted the State to consolidate the offenses and denied appellant’s motion to sever. The jury convicted appellant of both offenses, and the trial judge assessed punishment at ten years’ confinement for each offense, to run concurrently. On appeal, appellant argued that the trial judge erred by denying his motion to sever. The court of appeals agreed, holding that appellant had an absolute right to sever under Section 3.04 of the Texas Penal Code. Finding the error…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Motilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Schutz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Llamas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Whitaker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by26 opinions
- Lara v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Adam Rex Carter v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2024
- Antoine Kirkwood v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
- Arnoldo Vara Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Charles Johnson A/K/A Charles Daniel Johnson, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.