Legal Opinion
Brewster v. Technicolor, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 7, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
This is an action to recover damages for an alleged infringement of two patents, one involving a method for color cinematography, and the other for an apparatus for color cinematography. Both patents expired November 16, 1937. The damages claimed are those alleged to have occurred between March 29, 1935, six years before the commencement of this action, and November 16, 1937, the date of expiration.
Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, has served upon the defendant Technicolor Motion Picture Corporation,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. BentleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- McNamara v. ErschenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Lundberg v. WellesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Orgel v. Clark Boardman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Shrader v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.