Legal Opinion
McNamara v. Erschen
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 29, 1948No. Civil Action No. 910PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is an action brought by a widow for the death of her husband resulting from an automobile collision. Included in the action are claims by the widow, as an individual, and by her son for their respective personal injuries sustained in the same accident. The defendants served upon the plaintiffs eighteen interrogatories under Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. One of the plaintiffs answered on behalf of herself and the other plaintiffs the sixth interrogatory and part of the ninth interrogatory. To the remaining interrogatories and the unanswered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
- Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Kingsway Press v. Farrell Pub. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- V. D. Anderson Co. v. Helena Cotton Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1953
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Fidelis Fisheries, Ltd. v. ThordenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.