Legal Opinion
State of Ariz. v. Motorola, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 20, 1992No. CIV 89-1700-PHX-CAMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge.
Having considered all the briefing filed with regard to defendants’ joint motion for partial summary judgment regarding the causation defense, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument 1 , and concludes as follows:
BACKGROUND
In October 1989, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”) and the City of Phoenix (“City”) filed suit against sixteen separate defendants, seeking to recover approximately $54 million in cleanup costs incurred or to be incurred as a result of the toxic wastes found at the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Ascon Properties, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Town of Oyster Bay v. Occidental Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Acme Printing Ink Co. v. Menard, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.