Legal Opinion
Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 14, 1996No. 92 CV 8754 (BDP)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Town of New Windsor (“the Town”) brought this action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (“SARA”), P.L. 99-499 (October 17, 1986), specifically 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (“§ 107”) and 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (“§ 113”), and state nuisance law against defendants Tesa Tuck, Inc., Frye Copysystems, Inc., GAF Corporation, Lightron Corporation, Inc., Eugene Littman and Harry Basch, seeking recovery of…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Duling v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Oneida Indian Nation of New York State v. County of OneidaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Syms v. Olin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.