Legal Opinion
Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 24, 1994No. 3:92-cv-00581PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Dana Corporation, General Motors Corporation, United Technologies Automotive, Inc., and Warsaw Black Oxide, Inc. commenced this action for cost recovery and contribution under Sections 107 and 113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). The plaintiffs seek recovery from the numerous defendants of the past and future response costs at a former landfill site near the City of Claypool, Indiana known as the Lakeland Disposal Service Superfund Site (the “Site”), which is on the Superfund National…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Akzo Coatings, Inc. v. Ainger Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- DVL, Inc. v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.