Legal Opinion

Sease v. City of Spartanburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 2, 1963No. 18088PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

Mrs. Eunice C. Sease, the appellant herein, instituted this action and asked for a temporary injunction against the City of Spartanburg,' the respondent herein, restraining it pendente lite from proceeding in condemnation against her ‘property-and aftéí á hearing on-the merits that said injunction be made permanent. The appellant, by her complaint, challenges the right of the respondent to proceed in condemnation against her property. The Honorable Frank Eppes, the presiding Judge, issued a rule to show cause and a temporary restraining order. The respondent demurred to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gasque v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Smith v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. City of Rock Hill v. CothranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Brown v. HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Gainey v. Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. South Carolina State Highway Department v. AllisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Carodale AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Charleston County School District v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Tuomey Hospital v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Akers v. HardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API