Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Greenville

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 23, 1956No. 17147PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge, Justice.

Appellant based this action against the City of Greenville, upon an alleged taking of his property for public use without just compensation; and, the jury having found against him, he appeals, challenging the charge of the trial judge as to the measure of his recovery.

The complaint alleged that in 1938 appellant had purchased a tract of approximately fourteen acres in Greenville County, which tract was later annexed to and became a part of the City of Greenville; that between 1942 and 1946, when the tract was under lease from appellant to the United States government for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. Wilson v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rogers Ex Rel. Rogers v. Florence Printing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Daniels v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  3. State v. GrantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Hinson v. A. T. Sistare Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Sease v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API