Legal Opinion
Charleston County School District v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 31, 2001No. 3429PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
In this declaratory judgment action, Laidlaw Transit, Inc. appeals from a circuit court order dismissing its equitable counterclaims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP. We affirm.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 17, 1997, the Charleston County School District (“the School District”) entered into a written contract with Laidlaw and the South Carolina Department of Education (“the Department of Education”), whereby Laidlaw agreed to provide school bus transportation for the School District. Under the terms of the contract, Laidlaw was to use the Department of Education’s school buses, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Stiles v. OnoratoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Toussaint v. Ham Ex Rel. Bailey Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Sease v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Gaskins v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Volvo Construction Equipment North America, Inc. v. Clm Equipment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. CLM EQUIP. COMPANY, INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Lynch v. SeaseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Consignment Sales, LLC v. Tucker Oil Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Menezes v. WL ROSS & CO. LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.