Legal Opinion
Tuomey Hospital v. City of Sumter
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 13, 1964No. 18170PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, Chief Justice.
Respondent commenced this action seeking an injunction against Appellants to restrain them from condemning lands owned by Respondent in the City of Sumter. The Honorable James Hugh McFaddin issued a rule to show cause why Appellants should not be enjoined and restrained from proceeding with the condemnation proceeding.
Appellants in due time demurred to the complaint and filed its answer and return. After hearing, Judge McFaddin, by his Order of May 20, 1963, overruled the demurrer and granted a temporary injunction pendente lite.
The complaint alleges that Respondent, The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
- Arnsperger v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Edens v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Riley v. Charleston Union Station Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- City of Abbeville v. Aiken Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Karesh v. CITY COUN. OF CITY OF CHARLESTONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Georgia Department of Transportation v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Karesh v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.