Legal Opinion

Kawa v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 28, 2007No. 06-448CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s supplemental motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendant filed its motion (“Def.’s Mot.,” docket entry 18) on December 19, 2006. Plaintiff Michael Kawa, Esq., filed his opposition to defendant’s motion (“Pl.’s Opp’n.,” docket entry 20) on February 2, 2007. Defendant filed its reply (“Def.’s Reply,” docket entry 22) on March 12, 2007.

The Court concludes, for the reasons set forth below, that plaintiff has…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pucciariello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Greenhill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Dacosta v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Forest Glen Properties, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API