Legal Opinion

Pucciariello v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 2, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00590PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Senior Judge.

Now pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). That motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. Oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor deemed necessary by the court. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.

BACKGROUND 1

In this lawsuit, Plaintiff Carmine J. Pucciariello 2 seeks damages, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief, based upon the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) decision…

2Cases cited106 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Parker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Tulsa Airports Improvements Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Angel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API