Legal Opinion
Dacosta v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 11, 2008No. 07-807 TPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This action is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) (“Def.’s Mot. Dismiss,” docket entry 4), filed January 16, 2008. On April 16, 2008, plaintiffs filed a response to the motion to dismiss (“Pis.’ Response,” docket entry 9), and a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to RCFC 12(c) (“Pis.’ Mot. Judgment on Pleadings,” docket entry 10). Defendant filed a reply in support of its motion to dismiss, which also…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Whistleblower 14106-10W v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
- Whistleblower 11332-13W v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014
- Colman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Whistleblower 22716-13W v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.