Legal Opinion
Jackson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 27, 2008No. 07-713 CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This action is before the Court, on plaintiffs application to proceed informa pauper-is (“Pl.’s Application,” docket entry 2); defendant’s motion for summary dismissal for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter of plaintiffs claims (“Def.’s Mot. Dismiss,” docket entry 5); plaintiffs response to defendant’s motion to dismiss (“Pis.’ Response,” docket entry 6); defendant’s reply in support of its motion to dismiss (“Def.’s Reply,” docket entry 7); and plaintiffs surreply to defendant’s reply (“Pis.’ Surreply,” docket entry 8). For the reasons…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hampel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Young v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Smalls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Kalick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.