Legal Opinion

State v. Clobes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1988No. C7-87-1606PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

The sole issue for us to decide is whether the prosecutor’s failure to disclose certain evidence that might have been used to impeach a key prosecution witness justifies granting defendant a new trial on felony assault charges. Disagreeing with the Court of Appeals, we reverse the award of a new trial and reinstate the judgment of conviction.

This case grew out of a love triangle involving defendant, Sherri Luoma and Dr. David Fashingbauer, a chiropractor. All three are weightlifters. Defendant and Luoma lived together for 3 or 4 years. Defendant introduced her to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. RenierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. ClobesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ShoopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. MantheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. State v. SpannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API