Legal Opinion
State v. Hunt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 2000No. C5-99-72PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
Appellant Raymond Buster Hunt (Hunt) was convicted in Winona County District Court of four counts of controlled substance crimes. 1 Because the prosecution did not disclose to defense counsel until after the jury returned its guilty verdicts that a psychologist who examined the state’s primary witness pursuant to Minn. R.Crim. P. 20.01 had determined that the witness was incompetent to stand trial, we reverse appellant’s conviction and remand for a new trial. 2 We also conclude that the prosecution’s closing argument included comments that, while of questionable pro…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. BlancheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. PowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.